I really can't think of any.
Chirac?
Of course I do not like Mugabe. He is a rabidly homophobic lunatic who is starving his country to death and driving it into the ground and is now starting to up repression of student dissidents and trade unions.
Well, I guess Chirac is right of center, at least in the French context, so I guess you're right, though I never thought of Chirac as having my philosophy. You must be really clairvoyent - how did you know I didn't like him? [insert smilie - if I were smart enough to know how]
I really hate Mugabe, but I fear South Africa is moving in the same direction as Mugabe has taken Zimbabwe.
Back in 1998, I remember reading about how Mugabe was driving the white farmers from their land and giving the land to blacks, in the name of racial justice. I remember saying to people at the time, "You mark my words, but the next thing that will happen there is a famine, when the people to whom he turns over the land don't know how to produce anything from it." Of course, this is exactly what has happened.
Revolutionary leaders never govern well. They are good at tearing down the old system, but terrible at building a new one that is any good. Often, what they build is worse than the one they replaced, even for those they are supposed to be helping. This is definitely the case in Zimbabwe, and I fear it will end up being the case in South Africa. It will be very sad if the end result in South Africa is that the blacks there were better off under apartheid. But that is probably what is going to happen.
Socialism, which ignores basic economic realities, and the propensity to put people into groups rather than look at them as individuals and assess their talents as individuals, is what has led to this very pathetic situation. That, as well as the counterproductive desire to settle old scores.