NH: WBUR (MASSINC) - Trump + 1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 03:34:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NH: WBUR (MASSINC) - Trump + 1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NH: WBUR (MASSINC) - Trump + 1  (Read 5190 times)
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« on: November 03, 2016, 08:30:45 AM »

I'm thinking Clinton +1 or 2, so this is close to that (MOE). I also think undecideds break for Clinton here, but only if she stabilizes or gains momentum back.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2016, 08:50:11 AM »

God you are such a douch this morning.  Did someone wake up cranky.

This morning? He's been a very low quality and purposely instigating poster all week. Given how much he posts, I wish the mods would slap him on the wrist again, but they won't. So instead, important threads are filled with childishness.

Lol, no. The level of Presidential General Election Polls board among Red hacks is like this:

Good results for Hillary                 FF, Great poll
Bad   results for Hillary                 Junk, trash

Sometimes Almost often the same pollster turn into low-quality from high-quality and back several times during a month.
Or when the poll deviates by a large margin from what the average is showing, we call it junk.  Can your hackishness not see that.

2 of those polls are now outdated (3-4 points for Clinton on 10-25-16), and the other is just as far from the average, but seems to be pro-Clinton (+7).

It's possible it an outlier, but also possible it is pretty close.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 15 queries.