Day 141: Russia (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 06:44:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Day 141: Russia (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Day 141: Russia  (Read 4496 times)
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,557


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

« on: June 13, 2006, 12:54:40 PM »

I'll just say that I really hope ag replies to this one.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Not a democracy any more, not even a rough one...
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,557


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2006, 01:25:21 PM »

I'll just say that I really hope ag replies to this one.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Not a democracy any more, not even a rough one...

Well elections are held fairly, which is the criteria for a democracy, but the constitution is routinely ignored and other freedoms abriged consistently and corporatism prevalent.  (Sort of like PRI Mexico)

I'm not even sure about the fair election part Wink from the 2005 Freedom House report:
"Russia's political rights rating declined from 5 to 6, and its status from Partly Free to Not Free, due to the virtual elimination of influential political opposition parties within the country and the further concentration of executive power.

Political Rights and Civil Liberties
Russians cannot change their government democratically, particularly in light of the state's far-reaching control of broadcast media and the growing harassment of opposition parties and their financial backers. In the parliamentary elections of December 2003, more than two-thirds of seats in the Duma were won by the Kremlin's Unity Party, while most of the remaining seats were captured by parties promoted by the Kremlin-controlled media. There was significant evidence that there had been an undercount in the vote for liberal opposition parties that kept them from attaining the 5 percent threshold required for parliamentary representation. The leader of the third largest legislative party, Motherland (Rodina), backed President Vladimir Putin in the March 2004 presidential race. The Liberal Democratic Party, the fourth largest group in the Duma, is an ultranationalist faction known for the long-standing ties of its leaders to intelligence circles. The Communists are the sole party in the legislature generally free of Kremlin influence. In the presidential election of March 2004, state dominance of the media was in full display, debate was absent, and Putin won a first-round victory with 71.4 percent of the vote, more than five times that of his closest rival.

The 1993 constitution established a strong presidency with the power to appoint, pending parliamentary confirmation, and dismiss the prime minister. The bicameral legislature consists of a lower chamber (the Duma) and an upper chamber (the Federation Council). The power of the president is likely to be strengthened in the coming months, when the president gains control over the appointment of regional governors, who until now have been elected officials."
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,557


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2006, 02:05:51 PM »

I'll just say that I really hope ag replies to this one.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Not a democracy any more, not even a rough one...

Well elections are held fairly, which is the criteria for a democracy, but the constitution is routinely ignored and other freedoms abriged consistently and corporatism prevalent.  (Sort of like PRI Mexico)

I'm not even sure about the fair election part Wink

From Wikipedia:

Nevertheless, the election campaign and the actual balloting were both declared "free and fair" by an international observation mission run by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.

I prefer my source tyvm Tongue

And upon reading ag's piece I think I win. Grin
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,557


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2006, 02:43:09 PM »

I'll just say that I really hope ag replies to this one.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Not a democracy any more, not even a rough one...

Well elections are held fairly, which is the criteria for a democracy, but the constitution is routinely ignored and other freedoms abriged consistently and corporatism prevalent.  (Sort of like PRI Mexico)

I'm not even sure about the fair election part Wink

From Wikipedia:

Nevertheless, the election campaign and the actual balloting were both declared "free and fair" by an international observation mission run by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.

I prefer my source tyvm Tongue

And upon reading ag's piece I think I win. Grin

You don't think that Putin legitimately won?  I don't think voting is rigged, I just think the system is tilted to aid the person/party in power.

Putin may, in fact, have won a free and fair vote...if one had been held. As ag has said before, the same can be said for Lukashenka in Belarus, but that wasn't a free and fair election either. Smiley

Ag's third paragraph pretty much answers your second sentence. Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.