Romney/Gingrich 2012? Viable? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 02:00:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Romney/Gingrich 2012? Viable? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Romney/Gingrich 2012? Viable?  (Read 6708 times)
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


« on: July 31, 2010, 12:00:05 PM »

Let us suppose that Mitt Romney  wins the Republican Presidential nomination in 2012.

Let us also suppose that, in order to keep the conservative base happy, as well as to have someone he believes will be a credible and capable Vice President, Romney picks Newt Gingrich.

1.  Will Gingrich accept?

2.  Would Gingrich be credible?

3.  Would the Romney/Gingrich ticket be viable in the election?

Please discuss. 
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2010, 10:32:01 AM »

Gingrich is just about the perfect choice for Romney. He's got federal leadership experience, so Romney could still claim he is an outsider, but has someone with Congressional experience to help him out. Gingrich might appeal in the South where Romney is going to have some issues (though so will Obama, obviously). Gingrich's strength as an intellectual "idea man" could still hold true as VP, but his adultery scandal would be much less relevant as VP nom.

I think being a kingmaker is about the best Gingrich could hope for. I'm assuming the race ultimately boils down to a Romney-Palin showdown and Gingrich could help where Romney is weak (the South). A well timed Gingrich endorsement could wipe Palin out and give Romney the edge.

Romney stands for the nomination on his  own merits, record, accomplishments, experience, intellectual status, and business savvy, whereas the reason, and the only reason that anybody is even discussing Palin as a potential candidate is, obviously, because she was plucked out of obscurity by a desperate Presidential nominee who believed that bringing her onto the ticket would energize the party because of her youth and attractiveness.  McCain failed to recognize that Palin was in fact a lightweight airhead far out of her league and far out of her capabilities as a national candidate.

McCain tried desperately to pass Palin off as an energy expert , totally laughable, and as a maverick who would shake up Washington, whereas in reality she turned out to be not much more than the brunt of jokes, lampooned by late night comedy shows, and the pathetic subject of internet
stories, some true, some not.

McCain proved a failure as a nominee for President by miserably failing his first major test as the nominee, that being to pick a credible, viable, capable, knowledgeable, and competent Vice Presidential candidate.     
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2010, 07:22:33 PM »

Nods in agreement to what pbrower2a said.

I could not have said it better myself.

Us Republicans must face the facts, as uncomfortable as they were for us in 2008.  The circumstances were not favorable for any GOP nominee in that election.  After the meltdown, they became impossible. 

McCain did not, under any stretch of the imagination, do as well as he did because of Palin.  Some might say he did as poorly as he did because of Palin.

Myself, I do not believe it would have made one iota of difference to what McCain won in 2008 regardless of the running mate.

Of course, Palin did not lose McCain the election.  McCain lost McCain the election.  McCain, or any Republican, would not have won the 2008 election regardless.  I maintain McCain had no idea the scope of the derision his pick of Palin would make to the Republican ticket.  The Palin pick was a desperation move on the part of McCain.  He went for sensationalism, rather than going for competence, and rather than going for someone who was actually credible and qualified.

Anyone who can sit there and honestly say, with a straight face, that Sarah Palin is qualified to be Vice President of the United States, one heart beat away from becoming President of the United States, has my admiration as one of the truly great actors of the twenty first century.     
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2010, 10:41:58 AM »

Gingrich has no experience in running for any statewide office even in a state in which he could have won such an office easily. The last two current or former Congressional Representatives who had gone no farther (Senate, Governor) who were nominated for VP (Kemp, Ferraro) lost. Jack Kemp had plenty of good ideas, and by all accounts, Geraldine Ferraro was a more-than-competent Representative. They just didn't know how to operate a statewide campaign beforehand. Neither was able to deliver New York State. 

Gerald Ford  spent almost his entire political career in the House of Representatives before he took over the Vice-Presidency from the disgraced Spiro T. Agnew. He just didn't know how to campaign outside of his district, and it showed in his effort to win the Presidency  by election.

Although in 1932 FDR picked House Speaker John Nance Garner for VP.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.