32,000 jobs in July not 240,000.was the fed wrong? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:13:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  32,000 jobs in July not 240,000.was the fed wrong? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 32,000 jobs in July not 240,000.was the fed wrong?  (Read 9020 times)
classical liberal
RightWingNut
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,758


Political Matrix
E: 9.35, S: -8.26

« on: August 06, 2004, 02:14:59 PM »

And the unemployment numbers aren't usually affected because there are groups entering the workforce in big clumps (like at the end of the college year).

Vorlon, could you post that 1.1 million jobs graph that you used to predict the election?  I'm interested how close it has become.

He already posted it.

Logged
classical liberal
RightWingNut
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,758


Political Matrix
E: 9.35, S: -8.26

« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2004, 03:51:12 PM »

The people who got adjustable long term loans when we were clearly at the lowest interest rates that could be in teh forseeable future deserve to pay more for their stupidity.
Logged
classical liberal
RightWingNut
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,758


Political Matrix
E: 9.35, S: -8.26

« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2004, 05:31:55 PM »

Um...on the Fed, unless I'm mistaken the US does NOT have a fixed exchange rate, but a floating one, meaning that no one "protects" the exchange rate per se. Interest rates are used to control the inflation, which is what it is best used for.

The idea is that the currency is floating and thus its value is determined by inflation.  The fed's job is to keep inflation low and thereby protect the value of our currency.
Logged
classical liberal
RightWingNut
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,758


Political Matrix
E: 9.35, S: -8.26

« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2004, 06:02:15 PM »

The point of a laissez-faire system is the regulation is indirect.  Currency of course bounces around like any other speculative commodity; the idea is that it is generally constrained to a certain range as defined by inflation.  If there is much infaltion the range in which the currency bounces around is much lower than if there is deflation.
Logged
classical liberal
RightWingNut
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,758


Political Matrix
E: 9.35, S: -8.26

« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2004, 06:43:36 PM »

Of course, with the household survey, those who have given up looking for a job are not counted as unemployed; hence the unemployment rate shrank while the eligible labor force outpaced the job growth by 100,000 people last month.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.