A final vote is now open. Please vote Aye, Nay, or Abstain
Shouldn't unanimous consent have been declared first?
WB did post this:
considering the need for this to pass ASAP, motioning for unanimous consent to suspend the rules regarding minimum debate time and proceed to a final vote.
Yeah, and usually the PPT makes the observation that yes, unanimous consent has been declared, because theoretically part of being PPT is that nothing happens in the chamber without their say-so.
WB's motion was made, it hasn't been recognized technically.
Unless you're trying to argue that he specifically has to say 24 hours to object or whatever.
Yes. Someone has to say that.
I had a whole thing going on several times when I was PPT with running back and forth from the podium to do precisely this.
Yes Cao is right. It is very much possible for WB to put on both hats, even in the same post. However, in this case, he only really put on the first, that of Senator motioning for something.
