Better General: Ulysses S. Grant or Robert E. Lee (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 11:42:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Better General: Ulysses S. Grant or Robert E. Lee (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Better General: Ulysses S. Grant or Robert E. Lee  (Read 865 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: October 19, 2021, 02:49:03 AM »

Grant doesn't get nearly enough credit. Part of this is because for decades, the Lost Cause actively set out to demean his accomplishments and skills and engage in reductionism that attributed Northern success to various material advantages, painted Grant as a drunk and a butcher and Lee as this divinely endowed General who was facing impossible odds from the start.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2021, 02:21:26 PM »

To be fair, the South was facing impossible odds. Their only hope was that the North would let them go. Lee's delusion was that annihilating the Army of the Potomac would achieve that goal. It's what compelled him to wait an extra day in Sharpsburg after the bloody events along Antietam Creek in hopes McClellan would attack him in place. (Which goes to show that even as late as September 1862, Lee didn't really understand McClellan.) It's what caused him to engage in the Battle of Gettysburg.  If Lee had avoided battle whenever possible and simply led the Army of Northern Virginia in large scale foraging raids through the North, he could have both devastated Union morale and preserved his strength.

For Lee to have won the war using the strategy he followed, he would have had to face an opponent as reckless as John Bell Hood.

Many revolutions have succeeded against impossible odds at the same time. This gets back to the point that I was making about how the Lost Cause has warped the view of Grant and Lee as well. By putting down Grant's accomplishments (particularly out west) and glossing over Lee's mistakes, they were able to deify Lee at Grant's expense.

It also doesn't help that Grant's Presidency was marred by corruption and so forth, which further harms his reputation as this chain cigar smoking drunk.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.