Harris , Gillibrand and Warren endorse packing the Supreme Court (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 12:54:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Harris , Gillibrand and Warren endorse packing the Supreme Court (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Harris , Gillibrand and Warren endorse packing the Supreme Court  (Read 4485 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: March 19, 2019, 02:55:14 PM »

Chickens coming home to roost may make for a great talking point, but the fact of the matter is that we are going to keep descending into the abyss of hell until someone takes a step back and says hey we need to come together and find a better way. The alternative will inevitably be civil war otherwise.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2019, 06:23:04 PM »

> Cites a threat of eventual Civil War from court packing
> Is responded to with an example from the Civil War

Someone didn't get the point.

Roll Eyes
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2019, 06:27:20 PM »
« Edited: March 19, 2019, 06:30:40 PM by Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee »

I would also note that Lincoln believed in reasonable restraint of the popular majority and I would also point out that he opposed the concept of Popular Sovereignty as espoused by Douglas and Lewis Cass, which in an of itself was both arbitrary and also undermined the the legitimacy of the court.

I would also point out that both in the examples of Indian Removal, where the Supreme Court was ignored by the President and in Dred Scott where the executive branch meddled in the judiciary branch and the result was a ruling that ignored both history and precedent, were examples of the Supreme Court being corrupted by both politics and the bias of a given era.

And Lincoln did not ignore those precedents, hence why he pushed for the adoption of the 13th Amendment, because he knew a court could overturn the Emancipation Proclamation after the war.

 

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.