SB 2017-121: Nonpartisan Judiciary Amendment (Rejected) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 04:57:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 2017-121: Nonpartisan Judiciary Amendment (Rejected) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 2017-121: Nonpartisan Judiciary Amendment (Rejected)  (Read 1361 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: August 29, 2017, 02:10:16 AM »

I would note that during my tenure as Supreme Court Justice, I went through my worst activity rut in the game. This was caused by many issues, though one of the many factors was a desire to take a step back motivated in part by a desire to avoid a compromising situation and give breathing space for Leinad, Tmth and Clark to govern. Needless to say the last portion was misguided and led to disaster but real life demands also made it unavoidable anyway.


Of course towards the latter part of that tenure I found myself running for President, while also having a hurricane strike NC, the election itself, the turmoil afterwards etc etc. Good Times! Tongue


During the process I accidentally stumbled into having a situation with myself as Justice and my VP candidate as SoFE. While nothing wrong occurred, faith in the system is essential for its preservation and while we did nothing wrong that is not a assurance that in a future someone in a similar position will be likewise reasonable and honest.

Perhaps there are ways to address the matter other than what is proposed, but I think it is reasonable to have the discussion.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2017, 02:33:04 AM »

Sorry for not chiming in on this, RL has been rough this past week.

I agree with my colleague from Lincoln. There is no real issue here that imminently needs to be addressed. Preemptive solutions almost always end up with limited results. I won't support this legislation as it stands.

Does that imply you would support something else? Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.