Protecting Biodiversity for the Future Bill 2014 (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 10:44:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Protecting Biodiversity for the Future Bill 2014 (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Protecting Biodiversity for the Future Bill 2014 (Passed)  (Read 1485 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: October 27, 2014, 01:52:00 AM »

I don't have enough time to make a statement that will do justice to this issue but I will try to at least do something tonight.

I think it is very important that we preserve as much of our biodiversity as possible within reasonable limits and to a large degree we have made a lot of mistakes with development and wasteful land development. Many years ago I watched the movie Medicine Man with Sean Connery and in that movie he finds a cure for cancer in an Amazonian beatle, but a fire breaks out and burns down the whole section of the rain forest. I think we see that story playing out far too often and it is not just cures for illnesses that we are losing, but key lynchpins in the food chain that could spell out starvation on a mass scale and not just for us but numerous other species. We cannot hope to change natural processes, but we can limit the negative impact of our actions through conservative and smarter development practices.

The other side of this that has to be considered though is the structure and the consequences of that structure in terms of the economy. In that sense I share some of Deus' concern but would say also that a large broad mandate might not be generally very effective with regards to the issue at hand or achieve enough results to justify the economic loss incurred.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2014, 02:57:14 AM »

Again, assuming negative economic impacts is not the right way up approach this. Keep in mind that the impacts of invasive species impacts the national economy by BILLIONS each year.

Like I said the lateness of the hour meant that I did not have time to produce a fully developed post. I have to work tomorrow and one of my anti-malware programs just trashed my browser history and the start menu.

I do agree, but we should still be careful not only for that reason but also to ensure we are achieving results with the actions we are taking.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2014, 12:23:38 PM »

So bore is a Polnut sock. That explains a few things. Tongue


Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2014, 12:02:38 AM »

Section 3? Do we not already have laws against such importation and if so, should they be repealed or altered?
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2014, 09:47:08 AM »

AYE
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.