I don't really see the relevance of the story here. A couple of scientists were wrong and were quickly corrected by other scientists. There's not much to go here unless you want to pursue a logical fallacy that because one study on global warming turned out to be wrong all studies on global warming could be wrong. If you go down this path you could declare all science as potentially wrong. And maybe eating five cheeseburgers each day is actually good for your health then.
Do you really think it matters if its one or thousands if people begin to think you have been intentionally misleading them, whether or not its false. My first paragraph was objective analysis which I would advise not to be so easily discounted. The second one was my personal opinion.