SB 2017-121: Nonpartisan Judiciary Amendment (Rejected) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 01:29:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 2017-121: Nonpartisan Judiciary Amendment (Rejected) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 2017-121: Nonpartisan Judiciary Amendment (Rejected)  (Read 1364 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,268
United States


« on: August 27, 2017, 06:30:25 AM »

     I like the proposal. The title reminds me of an idea I have been entertaining to take the selection of the judiciary out of the hands of elected officials (who have partisan interests) entirely, though I don't know how that could be implemented. Reducing the capacity for partisanship to affect the Supreme Court in general is a noble goal.

     My only concern is that we may be restricting the actions of political parties more than we should in doing this.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,268
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2017, 07:05:59 PM »

     Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.