SB 2017-054 - Fiscal Responsibility in our Military Act (Passed--to HOUSE!) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 03:20:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 2017-054 - Fiscal Responsibility in our Military Act (Passed--to HOUSE!) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 2017-054 - Fiscal Responsibility in our Military Act (Passed--to HOUSE!)  (Read 1147 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,226
United States


« on: January 30, 2017, 04:08:07 PM »

I definitely like the idea of downsizing some of our military footprint, but I wonder if it might be a good idea to add some guidelines for what "useful" means.  We have bases in a lot of areas, from western Europe to Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region.  I'm not an expert on military bases, but I'd guess there are a lot of different reasons why some of those are there and could be useful for different reasons.  It might be a good idea to add in a veto power too in case there's something very important that gets overlooked by the committee.

     Indeed, we may want to outline what criteria these decisions would be made upon to help guide the committee through the process.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,226
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2017, 02:57:15 PM »

     Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.