Should the Democrats just run "Dan Malloy" in every state from now on? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 11:08:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Should the Democrats just run "Dan Malloy" in every state from now on? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes, this is the best way to win Governor races		  
#2
No, that wouldn't be fair to the Republicans		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 33

Author Topic: Should the Democrats just run "Dan Malloy" in every state from now on?  (Read 1588 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,226
United States


« on: November 07, 2014, 02:04:11 AM »
Quote from: MW Rep Vega on November 06, 2014, 05:41:20 PM
Conneticut kinda fell of everybody's radar until they remembered it like a week before election day.

He's lucky he wasn't running in literally any other state in New England except for maybe Vermont or Rhode Island.

     Massachusetts would have been good for him. Coakley being terribad doesn't speak to the leanings of the state itself.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.