RI-PPP: Whitehouse leads potential opponents (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 07:15:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 Senatorial Election Polls
  RI-PPP: Whitehouse leads potential opponents (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: RI-PPP: Whitehouse leads potential opponents  (Read 1058 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,271
United States


« on: February 23, 2011, 12:52:49 PM »

     Any ideas why Avedisian is polling better than anyone else? I would not expect the mayor of Warwick to be so prominent.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,271
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2011, 01:14:21 PM »

     Any ideas why Avedisian is polling better than anyone else? I would not expect the mayor of Warwick to be so prominent.

Warwick is about 8-9% of the state' population, and Lincoln Chafee used to have that position.

     Indeed, but he is polling better than Robitaille, who ran for Governor & lost by only 2%, & Carcieri, who is a former two-term Governor. Avedisian is clearly not a random nobody, but I do not see why he is doing better than candidates who have run statewide before.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,271
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2011, 08:06:08 PM »

     Any ideas why Avedisian is polling better than anyone else? I would not expect the mayor of Warwick to be so prominent.

Warwick is about 8-9% of the state' population, and Lincoln Chafee used to have that position.

     Indeed, but he is polling better than Robitaille, who ran for Governor & lost by only 2%, & Carcieri, who is a former two-term Governor. Avedisian is clearly not a random nobody, but I do not see why he is doing better than candidates who have run statewide before.

Couldn't it be that they have negatives from their statewide runs or terms that this guy doesn't?

     That seems to be the likeliest explanation, though given how well both Carcieri & Robitaille performed (by RIGOP standards, granted) I find it rather surprising that their negatives would be high enough to offset the benefits of the superior name recognition afforded by a statewide run.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.