CA: Public Policy Polling: Sen. Boxer now 8 points ahead (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:17:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  CA: Public Policy Polling: Sen. Boxer now 8 points ahead (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CA: Public Policy Polling: Sen. Boxer now 8 points ahead  (Read 2507 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,236
United States


« on: September 20, 2010, 01:29:07 PM »

Boxer just went on the air, so I'm sure that might have helped a bit. The numbers are accurate, Democratic registration in California is really high, the electorate might be a little less Democratic than the poll says, but not by much.

Yawn.

In 2006, it was 41% Democrats. In 2008, it was 42% Democrats.

     Based on what I have heard, the registration numbers should be slightly closer to parity for 2010. It will probably not be more than a couple of percent movement for each party, though.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,236
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2010, 05:22:57 PM »

Based on what I have heard, the registration numbers should be slightly closer to parity for 2010.

Really? Parity between Republicans and Democrats in California?

     Moving closer to parity != achieving parity. If the numbers in November were any closer than 39-32, I would be shocked.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,236
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2010, 11:06:00 PM »

I don't understand all this complaining about the internals. The latest Survey Usa poll shows very similar partisan breakdown at D 47 R 31 and Independents at 22. And that poll has Fiorina up by 2. Republicans need to realize that Boxer will probably win in November but it will be close. A 8 point margin would be about the upper end of the range for Boxer.

     The problem is that the internals are nonsensical. For some reason, I find it pretty unlikely that the electorate now will be even more Democratic-leaning than the 2008 electorate.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,236
United States


« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2010, 11:36:08 PM »
« Edited: September 20, 2010, 11:38:08 PM by Darth PiT, Imperial Speaker »

I don't understand all this complaining about the internals. The latest Survey Usa poll shows very similar partisan breakdown at D 47 R 31 and Independents at 22. And that poll has Fiorina up by 2. Republicans need to realize that Boxer will probably win in November but it will be close. A 8 point margin would be about the upper end of the range for Boxer.

     The problem is that the internals are nonsensical. For some reason, I find it pretty unlikely that the electorate now will be even more Democratic-leaning than the 2008 electorate.

The biggest difference between the partisan breakdowns of this poll (as well as the SUSA poll) and the exit poll is the number of independents. The number of independents drops from 28% of the electorate to 18% in the PPP poll. I wonder if the difference is due to wording of the question. Perhaps on the exit poll they specifically ask you which party you belong to while PPP and SUSA might ask which party you are closer to, with an option for true independents. I don't know if this is the case but something like this has to be occurring since the drop in independents really doesn't make any sense. You can argue that the partisan breakdown should really be D 45 R 35, but that doesn't change the final numbers much.

     According to the poll release, the question was: "If you are a Democrat, press 1. If a Republican, press 2. If you are an independent or identify with another party, press 3". That sort of shoots down that hypothesis.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.