FWIW, Chuck Todd said unequivocally yesterday that Rasmussen can't be considered any more a respectable pollster.
Link?
He said it on his twitter account where he had a spar with a couple of conservative columnists because he didn't mention at his show Rasmussen's Nevada poll that showed Angle ahead by 11.
Predictably he was called after that an "Obama lackey".
Then again the 11 point lead for Angle could be accurate in the form of a post-primary bounce in a general election face-off with a very unpopular incumbent.
Indeed. How familiar is the average Nevadan swing voter with Angle's views? If the answer is "not very", it's easy to see why a poll taken now would show Angle with a commanding lead.
