Proposed 29th Amendment [failed passage] (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 09:26:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Proposed 29th Amendment [failed passage] (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Proposed 29th Amendment [failed passage]  (Read 4054 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,242
United States


« on: June 07, 2010, 12:44:40 AM »

The bolded part could go and I'd be fine with that.  The complaint from Fritz (and thus the reason I introduced this) was that 8 months was too long and made it a hassle for him.

I'm not sure if he's supposed to comment in this thread, but I'd love to hear from Fritz on if he'd be ok with keeping all of hte language from the 16th amendment but just changing the word "eight" to "four".

     That would probably be wise, because the original text of that section did not specify that the voter had to miss four federal elections. It could be interpreted as meaning that voting in regional, special, & runoff elections count towards keeping one's registration valid, which would put a significant burden on the Registrar General to check those threads for votes by that person as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.