Goes against every recent forida poll. Even the august poll was an outleir .
*A+
that didn't stop the red avatars (or the homosexual wisconsinite) from crapping all over the iowa and nevada monmouth polls.
All I am saying is that this poll and it's senate race is off by a decent number compared to all other florida polls taken in september. PPP and nate cohn's pollster aren't exactly duds, and neither is CNN.
Marty--- this is factually inaccurate (Bolded relevant sentence). I went through and reread all of the Red Avatar posts regarding Monmouth-IA poll, and the reality is that the vast majority of posters weren't "crapping over Monmouth polls", but rather collectively "crapping their pants" over an incredibly strong performance for Trump from a high quality polling firm.
In fact many red avatars, and whatever unknown "homosexuals" from various states on the forum (Insert bizarre comment that you made) went to a point where many were positing Team Clinton should maybe scale down resources in Iowa and shift to other states....
As I stated earlier, I would much rather take an A+ pollster than junk polling firms to reflect an accurate picture
within a fixed period of time. Personally, I think FL has now shifted to a slight Clinton lead, but there are many unknowns with voting models and polling assumptions in states with fast growing net inmigration/outmigration regarding what the actual composition of the electorate will be come November.
