Trump cites sources: No charges for Clinton (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 12:44:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Trump cites sources: No charges for Clinton (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trump cites sources: No charges for Clinton  (Read 4342 times)
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,498
United States


« on: July 02, 2016, 06:29:27 PM »

How many more months do we have to care what this imbecile has to say? Four? Ugh.


Take it easy, Inauguration Day 2025 will be here before you know it.

Canada is definitely looking very appealing in that scenario...   Wink

BC has always been my favorite part of the country over many years visiting, and once get not only residency but also citizenship, would definitely be contributing to bringing the NDP back to power in a coalition with the Greens, as the most progressive part of the PacNW, (even more so than Seattle or Portland).

This is in a hypothetical parallel universe where Trumps wins the GE and then wins reelection in 2020.

Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,498
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2016, 07:40:33 PM »

The FBI isn't going to announce their findings for possibly another week, let alone today. Whatever "sources" are out there right now claiming this are just as credible as a Sanderista blog run by an H.A. Goodman-type.
Their investigation is finished, the interview with Hillary was the last part. So I'm pretty sure that the people involved have a good sense of where things are going.

Except the "people involved" haven't even said anything. All were getting the "Hillary not indicted" news from is Trump and "unknown sources."

THIS

However, end of day I don't believe that there will be, nor should be. and indictment. What however I do believe to be the reality, is that this is the main reason why Hillary is not performing better in the national polls, especially against a candidate like Trump, where she should have an overwhelming advantage on "personal attribute" type questions regarding judgement and honest.

Reality is that she should "done an Obama" to ensure that her data was secure, and compliant with Fed IT-Security Guidelines, instead of freelancing with "shadow IT", especially when as the Senior Manager of a business with 10k+ direct employees and budget of $50.3k Billion, and worked in some extra small dollars....

I recognize that State Department $$$ and staffing levels got slashed dramatically starting shortly after 2002, and have only been gradually rebuilding, but it does get ridiculous that she created this self-inflicted wound, and reputation as having good judgement and honest is now creating major unfavorable numbers in what should be a landslide against Trump, to the point that we might not have a huge Wave effect in November.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.