Electoral College problems for Republicans (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 04:17:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Electoral College problems for Republicans (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Electoral College problems for Republicans  (Read 5636 times)
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,175
« on: October 25, 2014, 07:03:07 PM »



Is this the only plausible victory that the Republicans can have in presidential elections? If so, they need a candidate that can carry Florida and Ohio (and Virginia and Iowa on top of that) with absolute certainty, or at least with better than 50% chance. Does a candidate like that exist?


Colorado would end up in that Republican column with Virginia and Iowa.

Margin spreads, Colorado-vs.-Virginia, have been tightly connected since 1996.

Margin spreads, Colorado-vs.-Iowa, were 4.00 percentage points (the most) since 2004.

Colorado and Iowa have some intrinsic connection: from 1920 to 1984, they carried the same every time. They had a break from each other in 1988, 1996, and 2000. (Look back to the 1930s and 1940s, they aligned with Democrat Franklin Roosevelt in his first two winning cycles, 1932 and 1936, and flipped Republican for 1940 Wendell Wilkie and 1944 Thomas Dewey and, four years later, said no to Dewey and flipped Democratic for the full term election of Harry Truman in 1948.) So, for the last 92 years and 24 election cycles, these two states have carried the same outcomes in 21.

Colorado and Virginia also have an intrinsic connection. Since 1948, they have carried differently just once—in 1992 (when Bill Clinton was the Democratic-presidential pickup winner who flipped Colorado but came up short in Virginia; Bob Dole flipped Colorado to his losing Republican column, in 1996, and the states' margins spreads have been tight ever since). That amounts to 64 years and 17 elections cycles in which they carried the same outcomes in 16 of those 17.


So, your suggested map came very close.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,175
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2014, 07:04:48 PM »

Is it possible that Hillary will perform much worse with men than Obama did?
If that happens, she may get less than 38% of the vote.
She won't get more women than Obama already got. I think Obama maxed out on women.



In those circumstances, which candidate would be best: Bush, Christie, or Rubio?
I know that Paul is a serious candidate and I support him, but I don’t think that 2016 will be his year because of ISIS.


I haven't been following your posts at this site.

What is your thinking for the 2016 U.S. presidential election?

Republican pickup — or — Democratic hold?
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,175
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2014, 01:24:15 AM »

Hillary is a strong candidate, so at this point I'd say a Democratic hold.
But there is a chance for a Republican pickup, because the Democrats have held the presidency for 2 cycles. In fact, any other possible Democratic nominee would have lower chances than Bush, Christie, or Rubio.


What are you basing that on?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.