Why was there no protest over the GOP with FL and MI? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:11:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Why was there no protest over the GOP with FL and MI? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was there no protest over the GOP with FL and MI?  (Read 1346 times)
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,821


« on: March 10, 2008, 02:16:29 AM »

NH and SC were penalized too.  Every state holding a primary before Feb. 5th was penalized by the GOP.  They have no special exemptions for IA or NH or any other state.

The thing is that no one ever expected that either nomination contest might turn out to be so close that the *delegates* of any one state might tip the balance between one candidate and another.  What the states holding January primaries were hoping for was that they would be influential because of the momentum that they'd provide, not that they'd provide a decisive number of delegates.

The key is momentum, which is not always a win. In Iowa, Huckabee had momentum from the win, and Romney lost momentum by losing to Huck by 9%. The twist was that McCain got a boost by placing 4th, nearly reaching Thompson's 3rd place total. McCain's move up helped provide additional momentum into NH. IA and NH have regularly provided momentum not just for the win but for beating expectations.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.