Why did Biden stop the CVAP numbers? Was there fear that SCOTUS would allow that data to be used for apportionment purposes? I think that you had informed me the CVAP numbers out there are stale and very inaccurate in some places. Without good numbers, how can you get to that "perfect" Goldilocks point that makes you a good VRA warrior?
My sense is that the decision was largely political in that one side wanted a direct measure of citizenship and the other side was opposed. The fact that the data could be beneficial to either side depending on its application was not material. Note my comment that the CB is punting to DoJ to determine how they might want to prosecute cases with data that doesn't map onto the 2020 Census.
The Census Bureau already has to figure out the total population based on 67% self-response and the remaining 33% coming from often dubious efforts to count people, so how should they produce a citizen-only population if citizenship wasn’t even part of the questionnaire ?
Here's the breakdown I copied of the Non-Response Follow Up which applied to 60.8 M housing units with no self-response.
6.3 M came in with self-response during NRFU.
13.5 M were determined to be vacant
10.3 M were deleted as no longer housing units
Of the remaining housing units 56% were collected by the enumerator at the household, 24% by proxy such as a neighbor or building manager, and 20% by administrative records. That 20% by administrative record was less than planned based on Census 2010. In the end the number of records that had to resolved by imputation was less than 1% of all housing units.
Data on non-citizens is very limited and can only be produced by the annual ACS, which is a survey of a few hundred thousand households and no complete enumeration.
emphasis addedNot entirely true. The federal government has a wealth of records on individuals that point to their citizenship. These administrative records were part of the existing plan to make a more accurate determination than the ACS, but their use was cancelled.