Property Rights, Dolan v. Tigard (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 06:45:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Property Rights, Dolan v. Tigard (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: The ruling was...
#1
Constitutionally sound
 
#2
Constitutionally unsound
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 13

Author Topic: Property Rights, Dolan v. Tigard  (Read 2491 times)
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,813


« on: November 04, 2005, 07:52:24 PM »

As I understand the situation in Tigard, Dolan was not seeking zoning approval, but a building permit. These are quite different powers of a municipaity. The granting of building permits is a ministerial rather than a legislative act. For such acts there must be a clear nexus that is uniformly applied to other similar situations. The City of Tigard was making a unique demand that was innappropriate in the given context.

For instance, in my county all building permits are conditioned on providing stormwater management on their land to compensate for the increase in impervious surface. This requirement has withstood court challenges. Cash donations to schools for residential construction also are acceptable. However, donations to schools from commercial property developers are unacceptable exactions, since there is no nexus.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.