Supreme Court Reform (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 01:54:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Supreme Court Reform (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Supreme Court Reform  (Read 736 times)
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,823


« on: October 24, 2018, 06:44:47 PM »

Personally I like an idea that was floated during the Garland delay. Set the SCOTUS at 8 justices and have a Senate Rule that they will only confirm nominees associated with a party so as to maintain a 4-4 balance. If SCOTUS is stuck at 4-4 the Appellate Court decision stands. It would take at least 1 justice crossing joining with the other side to break a tie and resolve an Appellate decision.

Part of this appeals to me since the IL Board of Elections works on a similar principle. It is 4-4 by party and it takes 5 votes to pass a motion. It has worked well to keep an unwanted majority from putting their thumbs on election decisions.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.