muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
Posts: 16,825
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2016, 09:05:07 AM » |
|
The staggered process cuts both ways. Later primaries have far more knowledge about the candidates who could be the nominee, but the early primaries have far more influence on reducing the number of candidates. This is a fairly unique election with both parties nominations going deep into primary calendar without a clear winner. Many years neither party goes very far at all before a winner is known.
The first ballot delegate binding has the effect of making the second ballot the meaningful vote if no one comes in with an outright majority. One reason candidates suspend campaigns but don't withdraw is to preserve those bound delegates at the convention. I think the easiest fix would be to require all states have the same rules for binding delegates - first ballot reflects the state's primary, and all subsequent ballots are unbound. If that is coupled with directly elected pledged delegates voters should get a reasonable reflection of their secondary choices.
If there is a desire for something like superdelegates, let those be selected at the state party convention and be bound to reflect the statewide primary vote on the first ballot. They can act as insiders to influence subsequent ballots if no candidate has a majority on the first ballot at the national convention. The directly elected delegates would then reflect the congressional district preferences and would reflect the voters' preferences should there be subsequent ballots.
|