LA Times speculates SCOTUS may change who counts for redistricting (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 11:43:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  LA Times speculates SCOTUS may change who counts for redistricting (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: LA Times speculates SCOTUS may change who counts for redistricting  (Read 553 times)
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,825


« on: December 09, 2015, 10:51:35 PM »

Here's another piece on this case.

The Texas and US Solicitors General raised what would seem to be a pretty persuasive technical point against the plaintiffs:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Emphasis mine.

To me, the whole CVAP thing is silly.  If your goal is to equalize voters between districts, then just make the standard a minimum deviation in the total # of votes cast in each district in the zero-year election (or most recent presidential election if preferred).  I would certainly hope we would always have an accurate official record of that!

But CVAP is usually the standard of counting in districts for the VRA. CVAP is used there to give minorities the ability to elect the candidate of their choice. If CVAP is what gives minorities fair access under the VRA, the argument is that it should be what gives everyone fair access to representatives.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.