muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 16,827
![](./avatars/Republican/R_IL.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: June 05, 2015, 09:03:33 AM » |
|
I'm with BRTD on the use of PowerPoint. The last two mainline churches I've attended going back to the early 2000s have used PP during the service. These are churches where the average age in the pews is over 50. PP provides large text for the biblical readings and lyrics to hymns, and the congregation likes that. PP also allows occasional video to be embedded and the pastor likes that.
In the 1960's it was unusual for the pastor to wear a microphone, but by the 1990's it was common. It helped everyone hear the service. Adding visuals on a screen/wall is a natural evolution from the addition of sound system.
|