What's WITH IT with senators? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 04:13:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  What's WITH IT with senators? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What's WITH IT with senators?  (Read 3237 times)
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,823


« on: December 31, 2004, 02:39:13 AM »

They were part of the Senate culture and didn't really understand the Executive Branch.

I've been a member of local legislative bodies.  You are not really administrating; you making collective decisions.  Even in local governments, where you can work with local administration, there is a difference.

Recently, most presidents were governors, who administrate thing.  The exception was GHW Bush, who ran a large government agency (and a business).
It's not only the lack of understanding of the executive branch, but also how one portrays issues. A legislator generally looks to their base in definining and explaining issues. Moving to the executive branch requires a more inclusive perspective. In speeches one will often note a level of specifics and details from legislators that are not present in executive presentations.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,823


« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2004, 03:32:04 AM »

They were part of the Senate culture and didn't really understand the Executive Branch.

I've been a member of local legislative bodies.  You are not really administrating; you making collective decisions.  Even in local governments, where you can work with local administration, there is a difference.

Recently, most presidents were governors, who administrate thing.  The exception was GHW Bush, who ran a large government agency (and a business).
It's not only the lack of understanding of the executive branch, but also how one portrays issues. A legislator generally looks to their base in definining and explaining issues. Moving to the executive branch requires a more inclusive perspective. In speeches one will often note a level of specifics and details from legislators that are not present in executive presentations.

You are making exactly the point I was trying to.  These are two different types of jobs.  The job of a governor is more like the job of president than the job of senator is like the job of president.

One of Kennedy's strengths was his ability to communicate like an executive, rather than  the Seantor he was. It's surprising that few other Senators have picked up on that.

The key is to remember that the electorate doesn't have the knowledge of the government insiders. In a local race I was involved in, one candidate made references to actions that were really only known to the council. The public thought the candidate was being petty.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.