Senate Protest and Analysis Thread

[MaxQue]

It is worrying to know one person has the power to decide when a region is dysfunctional.

Well, blame the authors of the Paficic Constitution, then. It's clearly written than the President has that power and we have nothing to do with it. Senate didn't write the Pacific Constitution, nor it has the power to amend it.

[MaxQue]

I have contacted the Justice committee chair if it's the appropriate committee.    

I answered you on that, but I doubt it's in the Judiciary committee powers anyways, unless it's considered related to regional law enforcement, which I doubt.

Anyways, the committee is busy until next Suday, we already are in the impeachment hearings of the Supreme Court Justices (which weren't my choice).

Is it not a legal matter by nature? As I said, we could possible take over for the Judiciary since we are only minimally engaged at present, provided the members agree of course.

Well, even if it's the job of the Judiciary Committee, I'm not sure it would be worthwhile to study the question. What can we do after that? We can't amend the Pacific Constitution, we can't abroge the degree and I doubt anyone wants to impeach the President over that.

[MaxQue]

I believe you're referring to the first vote on this Constitution.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=170986.0

No, it was the most recent one. He told me "not to tell anyone", but who am I to stand pat and witness an egregious injustice?

Well, unless a Court rules that vote illegal, it must be considered legal, in my opinion.

[MaxQue]

Why would I vote for someone to represent me if the candidate is living in a foreign country even if we are attached for electoral purposes. 

Well, it's pretty much your choice if you want to vote or not for someone.
You know, many countries have persons in Parliament for representing people in foreign countries. It's only a slight variation on that scheme.

[MaxQue]

If nobody took it, I'll take it.