SENATE BILL: President Pro-Tempore Activity OSPR Amendment (Passed)

[MaxQue]

I suppose there is an issue with the second part.

ii. now reads: 

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Either two was struck when it shouldn't have been, either it was rightfully struck, but we forgot to put the new time limit.

[MaxQue]

Shouldn't "Atlasia boards" be called "Atlas Fantasy Elections boards", to be exact?

[MaxQue]

Amendment:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article 2, Section 2 of the Senate Rules, Regulations, and Procedures shall be amended as follow:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article 2, Section 3 of the Senate Rules, Regulations, and Procedures shall be amended as follow:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[/quote]

I put it at the top, since Article 1 comes before Article 2. It's purely technical, it's only defining the words "Atlasia boards" which are proposed to be added to the OSPR by this amendment.

[MaxQue]

Oh, great. We have three texts sayings similar things, in three different ways.

Yours exclude child boards, through, like the Voting Booth. Is that a choice or an oversight?

Damn it Maxy, why didn't you tell me you were going to type a text.

Well, I interpreted your message saying than it could be fixed by two ways as meaning "You showed a problem, now fix it". As usual, I'm bad at interpretation of intent of people.

EDIT: Fixed a double post.

[MaxQue]

I would think that that the board, includes everything contained within, including child boards.

So, it's not a child board, then, it's a fetus board then, since it's still inside its parent.

Joke apart, I see your point and agree with it. I suppose we will consider only one amendment? (I sure hope so, it would be a waste of time of considering the three).

[MaxQue]

Or inserted into the relevant parts of the text in some manner like the two I composed or something similar.

Article 1, Yankee, not Article 2. The article containing a Section 2 called "Definitions"

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[MaxQue]

Does the term, "Atlasia Boards" appear anywhere else in the OSPR?

No.

As for the second pat of your message, well, it's another question. But I tend to think than your point is correct and than if the PPT is writing in his campaign thread, it's not relevent at all for Senate proceedings. If a PPT is campaigning for reelection, but is neglecting his PTT duties, that's still an issue here. So, we mothball our 3 amendments?

[MaxQue]

I don't see how to improve it or to phrase it in another way.

[MaxQue]

Aye

[MaxQue]

Aye