Actually on closer inspection the Act already covers this 
Section 6: Admissibility of Evidence
The presiding Justice may admit the following as evidence of the crime at his own discretion:
* 1. The actual statements made on the Atlas Forum itself
* 2. Screenshots of the statements made.
* 3. A quotation of the statement in a post by another Atlas Forum user.
* 4. The testimony of forum users who viewed the statement itself.
* 5. An admission by the accused in a thread on the Atlas Forum, or in a place viewed or heard by multiple persons, with recordings or testimony attributing to the same.
* 6. Evidence obtained through investigation of the IP address from which the offence was perpetrated.
* 7. Evidence given to the Court by the Forum Moderators or the Forum Owner, Dave Leip obtained in their capacity in that position.
The amendment may therefore be surplus to requirement.
No, since Court is refusing IP check evidence who was not autorized before the IP check by the Court.
