Southern States Challenging Gay Marriage in Name of Religious Liberty (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 05:00:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Southern States Challenging Gay Marriage in Name of Religious Liberty (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Southern States Challenging Gay Marriage in Name of Religious Liberty  (Read 3525 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,755
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« on: February 23, 2016, 01:14:07 AM »

oh ffs sjws, saying "bride" and "groom" on one form and having gender neutral terms on an other is the same as Jim Crow now?       
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,755
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2016, 05:28:41 PM »
« Edited: February 23, 2016, 05:38:03 PM by shua »

oh ffs sjws, saying "bride" and "groom" on one form and having gender neutral terms on an other is the same as Jim Crow now?       
Yes.  They find a way elsewhere.  This has cruel intentions written all over it.

Never ceases to amaze me how little capability some people have for understanding that not everything to do with thousands of years of marriage traditions is rooted in animus for gay people.
But of course you don't give a sh**t about traditions that don't specifically cater to your personal feelings.  And so the words "bride" and "groom" are now considered hate speech when referring to a marriage between a man and a woman.  The gay rights movement has been taken over by Jacobinism, dedicated to uprooting any traditional understanding of gender as it relates to marriage by root and branch, and by power of the sword if necessary. 

If you think use of gendered language on a marriage license for different-sex couples hurts same-sex couples in such a way that has the slightest comparability to the type of systematic discrimination that actually had concrete implications for millions of blacks and other minorities in terms of the type of education they could get or where they were allowed to live, then the most generous thing I can conclude is that you are a historical illiterate.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,755
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2016, 06:16:18 PM »

Would putting 'Bride A/Bride B' and 'Groom A/Groom B' on same-sex marriage licenses please people? Genuine question.

Seems like you could have little boxes that could be checked for "bride" and "groom" that would then appear on the license  but I have no clue who would find that offensive and who wouldn't.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.