Thoughts on the 2016 intervention meter by Cato? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 10:25:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Thoughts on the 2016 intervention meter by Cato? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Thoughts on the 2016 intervention meter by Cato?  (Read 534 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,834
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« on: February 08, 2016, 09:12:46 PM »
Aside from Graham being at the top and O'Malley and Paul being at the bottom, that makes no sense.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,834
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2016, 11:21:23 PM »
I think they did this just based on adding up whatever hawkish statements they randomly came across rather than looking at specific positions.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.