Just wondering (I'm not the sort of prude that cares if kids see a nipple or what have you) but you guys do know that the vast majority of parents don't have the time to screen or regulate their children's media intake. Perhaps that's terrible, but it's the reality of the world we're living in. I hardly see it as an egregious act of 'censorship' to regulate media targeted at children - the most susceptible, vulnerable members of society.
What do you have in mind? Who do you trust with the decision as to what is allowed, and how do you determine what constitutes media targeted at children?