“Accordingly, Hawaii’s marriage laws are not unconstitutional,” the ruling states. “Nationwide, citizens are engaged in a robust debate over this divisive social issue. If the traditional institution of marriage is to be reconstructed, as sought by the plaintiffs, it should be done by a democratically elected legislature or the people through a constitutional amendment,” and not through the courts.
This sort of unthinking pseudo-populism isn't actually a legal argument of any kind, but whatever. Who appointed this Kay character?
That's just the conclusion, not the argument itself.
