SENATE BILL: The Protection of Personal Choice Act (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 02:11:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: The Protection of Personal Choice Act (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: The Protection of Personal Choice Act (Law'd)  (Read 9020 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« on: July 16, 2011, 11:33:28 AM »

How is the PPHA being enforced? I hope restaraunt owners are not being compelled to act as cops against people smoking in their establishments.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2011, 11:58:27 AM »

Act as cops meaning? They call the police or they ask the person smoking to leave or stop smoking?
well the odd thing about this bill is that it says that certain establishments must not allow smoking, but that the individuals who smoke are the ones punished for a violation. so if someone smokes where they're not supposed to, it is mandatory that they be fined even if they didn't know the establishment wasn't exempt.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2011, 07:19:30 AM »

This looks like it would restrict the exemption even more than the current PPHA. Am I reading that right?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2011, 03:33:44 AM »

Establishments not exempted by clause 4, it should read.
so establishments that aren't allowed to have smoking are restricted to those over 18 Huh
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2011, 10:59:20 AM »

Ordinarily I would've made some sort of official comments on this bill by now but I'm sure the instant I did the sponsor of this particular piece of legislation would throw a fit over a "conflict of interest."
Don't make a comment and then pretend you're not making one. I don't know what this has to do with your position as GM. Are millions of people going to be dying in restaurants if this passes?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2011, 04:37:37 PM »

What's Jbrase's amendment trying to say? Just stating it only goes into effect in federally owned places in all the regions?
Yes, it deals with those areas over which the Senate has exclusive legislative powers under the Constitution Art 1, Sec 5, C 25-27.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2011, 06:34:26 PM »

In that case, I would oppose the bill. It would really defeat the whole purpose of the legislation. If I'm understanding this correctly, we simply go from making smoking illegal in public places to only making it illegal in federally owned buildings. I can't support that because I'm an obvious freedom hater. I will support the bill sans Jbrase's little addition.
No, it's not just federally owned buildings. It would also include all buildings in Nyman and in  territories outside the regions.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 07, 2011, 02:09:16 PM »

Aye
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2011, 11:43:04 AM »

Aye
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,842
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2011, 11:31:25 PM »

Excellent. I think this will be a good middle of the road policy that takes into consideration the concerns of all sides.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.