Random Experiment: 2020 polling averages adjusted by 2016 polling errors (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 05:42:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Random Experiment: 2020 polling averages adjusted by 2016 polling errors (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Random Experiment: 2020 polling averages adjusted by 2016 polling errors  (Read 1212 times)
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
« on: June 11, 2020, 01:19:20 AM »
« edited: June 11, 2020, 01:30:11 AM by Alben Barkley »

The fact that even all this pro-R "unskewing" where we lazily assume that the same polling error occurs again AND to the same extent (which wasn’t the case in 2018) only yields a map where Biden is already at 278 EV is pretty devastating for Trump.

I don't think so. I think we might be at a crossroads for polling. In the same way the "New York Times" and major newspapers or late night TV like "The Tonight Show" are now essentially arms of the left, we may see polling join that group, especially if polls overestimate Biden like they did many Democrats since 2014.

God I hope more of you people keep doing Donald Math and mental gymnastics like this to deny reality with your “alternative facts.”

Will just make the victory all the more sweet if you’re all shocked when it happens.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.