Karl Rove cited for contempt of congress. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 12:18:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Karl Rove cited for contempt of congress. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Karl Rove cited for contempt of congress.  (Read 1426 times)
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,332


« on: July 30, 2008, 04:28:30 PM »

Seriously though republicans, don't you think Rove should testify before congress or is the law just a "distraction" from the real issues. I mean since this wonderful congress of ours cannot get anything done, wouldn't it be great if they got to talk to this criminal.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,332


« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2008, 10:23:11 PM »

Seriously though republicans, don't you think Rove should testify before congress or is the law just a "distraction" from the real issues. I mean since this wonderful congress of ours cannot get anything done, wouldn't it be great if they got to talk to this criminal.

If you look at their position, where advisors cannot be called since they don't make the decisions, then I agree with Rove for not showing up.  If you take the position that anyone who provides advice can be subject to questioning, then you can take Congresses side.  Looking at this, neither side has made their case one way or the other.

I do not know why he has to evade congress though. Why can't he just show up and answer a few questions? And hopefully he doesn't pull a Gonzales and pretend as if he has been smoking pot hourly for the last 20 years.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,332


« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2008, 07:33:02 PM »

The executive privillege argument has merit, which doesn't exactly help the Democrats.

REJECTED! Hell yes.

Appealed.  Won't be heard until after Bush leaves office.

The argument has merit and will be litigated.

J.J., if you're referring to the article I posted, my understanding of it is they simply have to appear.  They don't have to say sh**t but they need to plop their but in the chair.

Yeah he will basically claim Amnesia and bounce. Will make for a hilarious daily show episode though. I love how he get most of his material from CSPAN. I really need to start watching that s**t.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.