The Convention for Agreement on Regional Consolidation in Atlasia - MAP SELECTED

[Sbane]

I don't mean to imply that I would leave Atlas in a huff if I don't get my way.  I'm saying that adopting a map that lumps my state in with Florida or California pretty much negates the purpose of regions completely.  I would have no interest in participating in such a region, where water usage and earthquake or hurricane preparedness are a big deal... and likely I'd just kinda fade away and fall off the registration roles.

My preferences.

1.  Map 8
2.  Map 1 (though this will pretty much ruin any chances of the Dakotas being relevant to the game)
3.  Map 4
4.  Map 6
5.  Map 5
6.  Map 2/3
7.  Map 9
8.  Map 7

Why should the Dakotas be relevant?

[Sbane]

I would just like to say that maybe population distribution shouldn't be given as much weight.  Here it seems like all the maps are distributed evenly. Splitting up all the regions is a good idea though. I would be opposed to any map that splits up only the Pacific and leaves other regions whole. Obviously others in other regions must feel the same way.