Smaller States Find Outsize Clout Growing in Senate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 02:30:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Smaller States Find Outsize Clout Growing in Senate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Smaller States Find Outsize Clout Growing in Senate  (Read 5828 times)
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,317


« on: March 12, 2013, 03:20:51 PM »

Yes I feel the power coursing through my veins! Other than the fact that Rutland got 4 times the money that the New York county did, I really don't feel bad that we have 2 senators just like New York. That's the way it's designed in the constitution, New York has 27 representatives, we have 1, that's also the way the constitution designed it.

Again, this says nothing about the moral validity and/or social utility of this system.

"That's the way we always did" is not an argument.
The small states like Vermont would get screwed over if it was just the house of representatives. I mean give me a break, Peter Welsh would be our only voice in that system. One house that is delegated according to population, and one house where every state has the same say in matters.

Man, I just feel the power just pumping through my veins right now, with these 2 amazing senators I have!

You have better ones than Matt, at least Smiley

Bandit has arguably the worst Senate delegation; Matt has arguably the best.
I actually like Patrick Leahy, he is a supporter of gay rights, environmental protection, and better education, also a very likeable guy, have you noticed him in the last two batman movies? Bernie Sanders (sorry I'm not a socialist), but at least he supports those same issues I support.

Why should every state have the same voice, if one state has 20 times the population than another?
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,317


« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2013, 04:09:16 PM »

Yes I feel the power coursing through my veins! Other than the fact that Rutland got 4 times the money that the New York county did, I really don't feel bad that we have 2 senators just like New York. That's the way it's designed in the constitution, New York has 27 representatives, we have 1, that's also the way the constitution designed it.

Again, this says nothing about the moral validity and/or social utility of this system.

"That's the way we always did" is not an argument.
The small states like Vermont would get screwed over if it was just the house of representatives. I mean give me a break, Peter Welsh would be our only voice in that system. One house that is delegated according to population, and one house where every state has the same say in matters.

Man, I just feel the power just pumping through my veins right now, with these 2 amazing senators I have!

You have better ones than Matt, at least Smiley

Bandit has arguably the worst Senate delegation; Matt has arguably the best.
I actually like Patrick Leahy, he is a supporter of gay rights, environmental protection, and better education, also a very likeable guy, have you noticed him in the last two batman movies? Bernie Sanders (sorry I'm not a socialist), but at least he supports those same issues I support.

Why should every state have the same voice, if one state has 20 times the population than another?
We'd get passed by on everything. We already do in some cases, Northern New England is the only region in the U.S. without a high priority corridor designation. We don't have any major east-west interstates, because we aren't guaranteed federal funding for the interstate. The region once passed a resolution for one, and it was struck down by the federal transportation department. Just because we don't have as many people doesn't mean we aren't as important.

Yeah, but on the other hand California doesn't get the funding it needs to properly serve its population's transportation needs. The Los Angeles area should get much more support in the building of freeways and local rail. Interstate 5 should be made 6 laned between Los Angeles and San Francisco. Does Vermont even have enough vehicular traffic to justify a east-west interstate? Interstate 5 on the other hand is chock full of cars and trucks every Friday and Sunday. Not to mention the feds don't even provide any support to service the people of Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia, Merced and Modesto, who all put together make up a population in excess of 2 million. I think people in smaller states get much more support in their transportation needs than those in cities and big states do.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.