jmfcst's 9% flat or the 1960 tax code? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 11:30:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  jmfcst's 9% flat or the 1960 tax code? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which do you prefer?
#1
jmfcst's plan
 
#2
1960
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: jmfcst's 9% flat or the 1960 tax code?  (Read 3186 times)
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,316


« on: October 30, 2011, 12:27:42 PM »

High tax rates with a large exemption is certainly something I could go for. Exclude the first 30k of your income. Then a 20% tax with no deduction up to say 70-80k. Then 40% up to 150k. And then 45% above that ( I don't think tax rates above that get you as much revenue as you think). 30k is enough to cover living expenses everywhere and it's not like 20% is a lot, which you will pay on your next 40-50k in income.

I would also get rid of the ridiculous single or married etc. Everyone pays the same rate, based on their individual income, not their household income. So a two earner household with both making about 60k pay only 10% in income taxes. Sounds good to me. And those with ridiculous incomes get squeezed, and they can afford to be squeezed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 14 queries.