Should India have an Uniform Civil code? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 10:51:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should India have an Uniform Civil code? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should India have an Uniform Civil Code?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 15

Author Topic: Should India have an Uniform Civil code?  (Read 2575 times)
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« on: September 01, 2011, 05:53:31 PM »

Should India have an Uniform Civil code which applies the same, secular, personal law to all individuals regardless of religion, caste, or tribe?

I think so, yes. Although Hindu law (and Buddhists, Sikhs and Jains are covered under this) has been reformed to modern standards (as well as laws for Christians), personal laws for Muslims are still under Islamic law. This has meant that backward practices like polygamy still live on in India in the name of religious freedom. This has to end. India needs equality for all of it's citizens regardless of their background.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2011, 06:04:40 PM »
« Edited: September 01, 2011, 06:10:26 PM by sbane »

I'm guessing it would be something like it is in most of the modern world?

In any case, I would be more interested in the same laws in the case of divorce or in terms of banning polygamy. I would also like to take marriage out of religious hands, but that isn't even the case in the west so there it would be similar to the situation here.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2011, 06:11:15 PM »

I'm guessing it would be something like it is in most of the modern world?

What do you mean by the modern world?

No polygamy. Divorce laws that aren't discriminatory towards women and guarantee alimony and such things.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2011, 07:08:45 PM »
« Edited: September 01, 2011, 07:11:54 PM by sbane »

I'm guessing it would be something like it is in most of the modern world?

What do you mean by the modern world?

No polygamy. Divorce laws that aren't discriminatory towards women and guarantee alimony and such things.

And no arranged marriages...   

More like no forced marriages? Obviously, yes.

There are probably laws against it already, though not properly enforced. Realistically, even passing an Uniform Civil code won't end practices like polygamy, but at least it will be on the books. Reforming the horribly corrupt Indian civil service, police and government workers has to be the next step in the process.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2011, 08:38:51 AM »


And there's the whole problem with projects like this. Civil Law that no one actually follows is actively worthless.

I wouldn't say it's completely worthless. It might be in the villages with corrupt policeman and ISA officers hanging about. In the city you have many more options, and having laws on the books does help, doesn't it? For example you do keep hearing cases of women getting justice after getting harassed due to not having a dowry. Now, this may be a small proportion of the true number of cases out there, but even if one woman gets justice, I think it's good enough. If even one woman is able to stop a polygamous relationship due to this law, it would be good enough for me.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2011, 01:27:26 PM »
« Edited: September 02, 2011, 01:29:55 PM by sbane »

The fact that Hindu nationalists can and do exploit this issue should be an even greater reason for the Congress party to pass a sane, secular civil code for all. There is no justification for continuing assbackwards laws in India. Just because the BJP supports getting rid of it is obviously not enough.

You want to hand the BJP another issue to get the urban middle class on their side (reservations for OBC's being the main one), go for it. They aren't so interested in going after Muslims as some of you might think. The middle class likes stability after all....

Sadly the Congress party won't do it either because they need to preserve their vote bank, don't they?
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2011, 10:50:37 AM »

But what if the woman wants to get an arranged marriage? You are ok with that, no? I mean this is a cultural thing that is ingrained into many people. You would be taking away their freedom of choice!! Tongue

For example one of my cousins is probably going to get married in a year or two. Her parents are showing her pictures of guys and their profile on some matrimonial site. So it's a mix of online dating and blind dates. Cute, isn't it?
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2011, 02:42:03 PM »

I still don't see why we shouldn't have the laws on the books though. Because unless you don't, a girl won't be able to appeal to the police if she is being forcibly being married off underage. Of course in most rural areas that is a laughable proposition but still.....
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2011, 06:17:32 PM »

Why do Westerners get boners from banning polygamy?

Theoretically, polygamy would be fine if it was all consenting adults and the one controlling the harem could be male or female. It rarely works like that though.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 15 queries.