Is being popular in high-growth areas a problem for Republicans? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 08:39:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Is being popular in high-growth areas a problem for Republicans? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is being popular in high-growth areas a problem for Republicans?  (Read 1403 times)
cannonia
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 960
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.42, S: -1.30

« on: March 29, 2008, 04:26:46 AM »

Around Sacramento and Stockton, new construction means less agricultural land, which would mean displacement of Hispanics living and working on the farms or dairies.  Plenty of (higher-income) Hispanics have been moving in, but it's a wave of immigration from the Bay Area, so it's a very diverse population in general.

But it is a matter of lifestyle:  For a young Bay Area family looking for an affordable house in a good school district, Elk Grove looks much better than most places around the Bay.  Conversely, younger, leftier types like SF better.

Both the Central Valley and places like Riverside and San Bernardino Counties have been growing rapidly and trending Republican.  That's not a problem for the Republicans here; it could make the state competitive again.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.