I'd go as far as to say the winner of Iowa wins the election. For me, it is actually the best barometer of opinion-where Missouri was 15 years ago.
So you believe Gore won the 2000 election then?
Actually he did win the popular vote, and electorially speaking was the closest race I know of. So the 2000 race I think supports that thesis. The reason that Iowa may be a good indicator for the general election is that Iowa is that is part of the region that usually is the deciding factor for a race. This region is in between the Great Lakes area, the north east, and part of the south. I call it the election belt. This region comprises of West Virginia, Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Missouri, Iowa Tennessee, and Arkansas . No candidate has become president without wining most of these states. Bush won all of these states (except Iowa the first time), Clinton won all (except Virginia), and Bush and Reagan won all (except West Virginia).