''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 05:15:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy  (Read 7363 times)
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,861
« on: January 03, 2009, 10:31:50 PM »
"Eye for an eye" is a crude way to put it, but the principle's right.  If someone poked my eye out I'd seek financial compensation equal to what the eye would have brought me later in life, compensation for any medical procedures necessary, and punitive damages.  I would NOT seek to gouge the other guy's eye out, but it amounts to the same thing in the final analysis.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.