Which party would theoretically benefit more from 100% turnout / mandatory voting? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 03:53:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Which party would theoretically benefit more from 100% turnout / mandatory voting? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Which party would theoretically benefit more from 100% turnout / mandatory voting?  (Read 1171 times)
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,907
« on: December 02, 2020, 12:15:36 PM »
Quote from: Red Wall on December 01, 2020, 12:29:11 PM
Plus some times the fine is so ridiculously low people just pay it anyway. Even the poorest, which are the ones with the highest abstention rate.

I mean, yes, but Australia's 92% voting rate might as well be 100%. You get it that high and the difference between it and everyone voting is neglible.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.