Explaining why the Steele Dossier isn’t collusion (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 12:25:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Explaining why the Steele Dossier isn’t collusion (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Explaining why the Steele Dossier isn’t collusion  (Read 1163 times)
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,907


« on: June 17, 2019, 12:51:14 AM »


So just to clear up because Trump and others have been saying that the Steele Dossier is no different then what Trump said in the ABC interview. Steele is a private citizen hired by an American firm to do oppo research on Trump which he did with a dossier who’s content he was concerned enough with to go to the proper authorities over and to top it off Hillary never even used the dossier. Nothing about that situation is remotely similar to what Trump’s campaign did in 2016 or what he said in the interview.

You're missing the crux of Trump's argument, which is that Steele is British and not an American citizen.

It's still a dumb argument, though. Steele was alarmed enough by what he turned up that he turned his research over to the FBI, and nothing from Steele's research was ever used by the Clinton campaign.

The Steele Dossier is interesting...it was a fine "first draft" of what was going on, but like any first draft, got many things big and small wrong. It's interesting how many aspects of it panned out and how much of it very, very much did not pan out.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.