IA-Change Research: Biden & Sanders tied, others not far behind (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2024, 09:08:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  IA-Change Research: Biden & Sanders tied, others not far behind (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IA-Change Research: Biden & Sanders tied, others not far behind  (Read 1008 times)
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,950


« on: May 20, 2019, 10:09:12 AM »

Change Research seems to be more Sanders friendly than the other pollsters. But still, it does appear that Sanders has regained some support, while Biden has lost some from his peak.

If such a result were to occur, only Biden and Sanders would get delegates. For the race to not be just Sanders vs Biden, someone's gotta break the 15% marker in Iowa.

You gotta keep in mind though that, unless they changed this system (and I don't think they have), this applies at each caucus location with a possibility of switching. So if this result were to happen in a bellweather Iowa caucus location, the supporters of other candidates would get to switch around.

Thing is that if only Sanders and Biden get delegates in IA, then momentum will be on their side. Voters will naturally flow towards the two from the minor candidates. At that point, a minor candidate would need to claw back momentum by doing well in the other 3 states, a rather difficult feat. If a minor candidate gets 15%(in this case it would be Buttigieg), then they can obtain some momentum and put up a strong showing.

You need that 15% to start off with to get your campaign going.

The point is that Buttigieg or Warren (for example) could easily hit the delegate threshold on these numbers due to the redistribution of people who went for nonviable candidates in each of the caucus sites.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,950


« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2019, 01:54:22 PM »

It's further complicated by the new absentee voting counting as one big caucus site but capped at 10% of the overall delegates (for the % number) no matter how many people participate through absentee measures, which might skew the popular vote/caucus delegate thing even more.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,950


« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2019, 01:59:28 PM »

Also, Mr. Morden's post gets at what I was saying earlier about what the results will actually look like.

This poll probably translates to something like:

Biden and Sanders both ~35
Buttigieg 16
Warren 10
Harris 3
Other 1

Once you actually factor in the caucus process and how every caucus site will eliminate candidates below viability there.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.