the key phrase here is 'land swaps'. any map that stands a chance of being acceptable to a large portion of Israelis is going to be as much land swaps as it is 67 borders, but anything is going to be a tough sell. I can't believe they would let the country be so thin at Tel Aviv or give up the Golan Heights. I'm afraid this is just giving Palestinians an unrealistic idea of what a peace deal would be like.
Who said anything about including the Golan Heights in Palestine? That dispute is with Syria, no? 
Among many other differences, Syria actually wants Golan back, while obtaining the West Bank is the stuff of Jordanian nightmares.
